Simplified Motive for Bloodshed
October 13, 2023
When matters are at a highly intense magnitude, or when in doubt as to what to say, say something.
Of course there stands the basic principle of not to engage in bloodshed unnecessarily.
This post pertains to the current escalation of 'missile-lobbing' occurring in the Palestine-Israel region as we speak and this past week. And perhaps a few other tensions.
Regarding the Palestine-Israel region:
Names of different nations, kingdoms, countries, including Palestine and Israel themselves have changed over the years, for instance there was Transjordan, the United Arab Republic, the region Anwar Sadat was involved with going back and forth with Egypt, etc.
Individuals, for instance known as Ashkenazim, fled regions of the world and came to the Palestine-Israel region, this while the 'Aryan' racial gambit was propagated (reference to 1930s and 40s era). Part of the gambit that was a 'motive for bloodshed' during the Hitler/Nazi era, was the Aryan was the highest level of a 'pure race'. Now, [point interjection,] from many places of the world did helpers of Prophets, notably and perhaps aptly Isa/Jesus, come to serve, and they are considered to have descendants. So, how is it the Aryans are put on a pedestal in that lens (within that lens)? in that oppression game. This is not to say that persons with descent back to Aryans real or fictitious, are not special; the game, as Harman Black puts it, had to do more with who spoke certain languages, not outward composition and features, basically what a person looked like, otherwise Hitler would have plausibly disqualified his own self to a degree.
So, who are these persons in Israel, in Palestine, and much more? And of course why would special people lob rockets at special people, sometimes close cousins, if not brothers and sisters, over political boundaries whose names have changed since some of us have been kids, or just language differences?
Think about it, breathe deep, and ask yourself, what am I doing, and why am I doing it? Does it serve the highest aim?
***
In the eras of American Indians and Native Americans in the US, let us say about 2 to 300 years ago, this is the brief version for illustration, there was once a group of 2 or 3 young men, say about 10 years old, they grew up to be about 100 years old. In that span of time they witnessed their tribe (singular), grow, become more populous, then split up, into eventually what members in later generations referred to as distinct tribe. Of course as aspects of the analogy is suspected to go, the 'new' tribes went to war. The old men of 100 years old were distraught that their one tribe had members fighting against each other, moreover, the younger members did not even know that they were of the same tribe.
***
After reviewing hundreds if not thousands of photos or pictures of post bombings involved with conflicts and acts of terrorism over decades, there are certain things which are almost plain to see in the Palestine-Israel situation over the past week to 2 weeks. There appears to be narcotic residue mixed in the explosives leaving residue all over the cars.
What does that tell me? tell you? tell us?
That whatever is going on, has some evil dimensions to it; and at that, let's hold a brief discussion about the topic of life being sacrificed, whether you believe in such a thing or not.
Defend holy places with your lives has been a longstanding principle in many societies for epochs. When lives being taken are not over the defending the holy places, but the subject matter may be in backdrop back when people used to, it can become an issue, because it makes it look like history from old time is being used for other purposes.
These other purposes can include, propagating military-industrial complexes (plural), so that rich get rich, poor get poorer deal; and wealth through drug trade.
Hurrying this up, we might get back to it later, there may, stand a chance that there is a third party that is fomenting, propelling, conflict and the loss of life, outside of Hamas, and government of Israel. Once again, why would special (who have intrinsically the common sense to see the obvious), take violent action against the special, at least at the startup phase? Two main possibilities: one they aren't, and secondly there is a good reason, which some of us are still waiting for the announcement and have not seen it.
Remember, (again a rush brief version of a take on history,) decades back there was the PLO, then pro-Palestinians started to feel the PLO weakened their stance, and were relived that Hamas the group started to phase in and push the PLO to the backdrop; then pro-Palestinian proponents started to feel Hamas started to get weak.
***
Constrainments to Gaza evolved in recent years
[Differing interpretations as to status of government and political presence is a longer conversation, constrainments is said to quickly help illustrate]
***
A half million, a million, 1.1 million, whatever the number is, must 'flee' or 'evacuate' Gaza? It can be seen and understood why some just throw their hands up and say they have had enough with the fleeing business. Are rational individuals, some of high degree, actually supposed and are expected to, start frantically fleeing with no pre-designated place to flee to, and be a part of a chaotic transiting scene, moment?
***
'Jew' has many meanings and derivations
***
A message to college students around the world: Time would be better spent in constructive discussion, as opposed to arguing out in the lawn. No one wants tensions escalating to fighting (on college and university campuses), there is enough violence already in the region of the situation.
***
There was a translated from Russian to English video recording of Putin saying in rough-cut words 'it looks like we now have gained considerable amount more of polarization', this around he time of a few months into the recent invasion into Ukraine. Keep in mind the Russia-Ukraine relationship has changed back and forth for centuries at least.
--
Is it possible, the previous polarization in terms of a conflict that gained it, was around the Middle East? Very. Is it possible the only way to shift polarization ack to the Middle East is to stage a heightened level of bloodshed so shocking and disgusting, by natural human reaction, they cannot help but focus on that conflict? Is this it?
***
Hodge-podge of simple, really simple, motives to feed the lust for money
***
Long story short, a big calling is to conduct an in depth thorough investigation as to who started the rocket-lobbing, and find out who is lurking there, perhaps taking advantage of the Palestine-Israel tensions.
Possibly to be continued
Of course there stands the basic principle of not to engage in bloodshed unnecessarily.
This post pertains to the current escalation of 'missile-lobbing' occurring in the Palestine-Israel region as we speak and this past week. And perhaps a few other tensions.
Regarding the Palestine-Israel region:
Names of different nations, kingdoms, countries, including Palestine and Israel themselves have changed over the years, for instance there was Transjordan, the United Arab Republic, the region Anwar Sadat was involved with going back and forth with Egypt, etc.
Individuals, for instance known as Ashkenazim, fled regions of the world and came to the Palestine-Israel region, this while the 'Aryan' racial gambit was propagated (reference to 1930s and 40s era). Part of the gambit that was a 'motive for bloodshed' during the Hitler/Nazi era, was the Aryan was the highest level of a 'pure race'. Now, [point interjection,] from many places of the world did helpers of Prophets, notably and perhaps aptly Isa/Jesus, come to serve, and they are considered to have descendants. So, how is it the Aryans are put on a pedestal in that lens (within that lens)? in that oppression game. This is not to say that persons with descent back to Aryans real or fictitious, are not special; the game, as Harman Black puts it, had to do more with who spoke certain languages, not outward composition and features, basically what a person looked like, otherwise Hitler would have plausibly disqualified his own self to a degree.
So, who are these persons in Israel, in Palestine, and much more? And of course why would special people lob rockets at special people, sometimes close cousins, if not brothers and sisters, over political boundaries whose names have changed since some of us have been kids, or just language differences?
Think about it, breathe deep, and ask yourself, what am I doing, and why am I doing it? Does it serve the highest aim?
***
In the eras of American Indians and Native Americans in the US, let us say about 2 to 300 years ago, this is the brief version for illustration, there was once a group of 2 or 3 young men, say about 10 years old, they grew up to be about 100 years old. In that span of time they witnessed their tribe (singular), grow, become more populous, then split up, into eventually what members in later generations referred to as distinct tribe. Of course as aspects of the analogy is suspected to go, the 'new' tribes went to war. The old men of 100 years old were distraught that their one tribe had members fighting against each other, moreover, the younger members did not even know that they were of the same tribe.
***
After reviewing hundreds if not thousands of photos or pictures of post bombings involved with conflicts and acts of terrorism over decades, there are certain things which are almost plain to see in the Palestine-Israel situation over the past week to 2 weeks. There appears to be narcotic residue mixed in the explosives leaving residue all over the cars.
What does that tell me? tell you? tell us?
That whatever is going on, has some evil dimensions to it; and at that, let's hold a brief discussion about the topic of life being sacrificed, whether you believe in such a thing or not.
Defend holy places with your lives has been a longstanding principle in many societies for epochs. When lives being taken are not over the defending the holy places, but the subject matter may be in backdrop back when people used to, it can become an issue, because it makes it look like history from old time is being used for other purposes.
These other purposes can include, propagating military-industrial complexes (plural), so that rich get rich, poor get poorer deal; and wealth through drug trade.
Hurrying this up, we might get back to it later, there may, stand a chance that there is a third party that is fomenting, propelling, conflict and the loss of life, outside of Hamas, and government of Israel. Once again, why would special (who have intrinsically the common sense to see the obvious), take violent action against the special, at least at the startup phase? Two main possibilities: one they aren't, and secondly there is a good reason, which some of us are still waiting for the announcement and have not seen it.
Remember, (again a rush brief version of a take on history,) decades back there was the PLO, then pro-Palestinians started to feel the PLO weakened their stance, and were relived that Hamas the group started to phase in and push the PLO to the backdrop; then pro-Palestinian proponents started to feel Hamas started to get weak.
***
Constrainments to Gaza evolved in recent years
[Differing interpretations as to status of government and political presence is a longer conversation, constrainments is said to quickly help illustrate]
***
A half million, a million, 1.1 million, whatever the number is, must 'flee' or 'evacuate' Gaza? It can be seen and understood why some just throw their hands up and say they have had enough with the fleeing business. Are rational individuals, some of high degree, actually supposed and are expected to, start frantically fleeing with no pre-designated place to flee to, and be a part of a chaotic transiting scene, moment?
***
'Jew' has many meanings and derivations
***
A message to college students around the world: Time would be better spent in constructive discussion, as opposed to arguing out in the lawn. No one wants tensions escalating to fighting (on college and university campuses), there is enough violence already in the region of the situation.
***
There was a translated from Russian to English video recording of Putin saying in rough-cut words 'it looks like we now have gained considerable amount more of polarization', this around he time of a few months into the recent invasion into Ukraine. Keep in mind the Russia-Ukraine relationship has changed back and forth for centuries at least.
--
Is it possible, the previous polarization in terms of a conflict that gained it, was around the Middle East? Very. Is it possible the only way to shift polarization ack to the Middle East is to stage a heightened level of bloodshed so shocking and disgusting, by natural human reaction, they cannot help but focus on that conflict? Is this it?
***
Hodge-podge of simple, really simple, motives to feed the lust for money
***
Long story short, a big calling is to conduct an in depth thorough investigation as to who started the rocket-lobbing, and find out who is lurking there, perhaps taking advantage of the Palestine-Israel tensions.
Possibly to be continued
Posted by HCN.
