Everyone on earth is not living inside the right and left of the brain of whoever went forward on to follow through or not follow through with a missile strike targeted to a location in a sovereign nation not their own.

As of right this moment 9/2025, it may not be widespread information to the public (yet) just where the physical point of emanation missiles came from that struck targets in Qatar over the past couple of days.

In some aspects, it might not matter all that much.

However there are other aspects where doors are open to serious issues.

If missiles were indeed 'from' Israel, there may be a 3 to 4 option list as to what may have occurred, in order for those missiles to be fired and land on the target.

Option 1- missiles fired from within the geographic confined of today's Israel boundaries (boundaries according to for instance, transnational entities that have certain recognition of nations a precursor to membership).

Option 2- missiles fired outside the above referenced boundaries.

2a- missiles emerged from another country on land
2b- missiles fired from sea, such as a warship
2c- missiles fired from a machine already in the land, in this case Qatar
2d- missiles fired from the air, which could be just like the above list, over Qatar, near Qatar, over water declared it undeclared, from over Israeli airspace, combination, unclear, or not applicable

Some of the above options could include missiles flying over or near the Kaaba and Prophet's Masjid and tomb, which according to the Muslim World, is about the furthest 'no no' one can possibly get.

No no basically in English refers to principles of risk and protection.

Issue/s #2:
If indeed the basic premise, which is what popular media is saying, is Israel is seeking out targets of the referent Hamas, both sides need to, if they haven't already (it's about rest assured they know this and more), recognize the humaneness, today's catchword, humanity, of flying missiles around. If you know you may be the highly potential target of a missile strike, why be in an area that you know if struck would endanger the area, the people, and trajectory of aerial weapons, in and around it?

More background:
Historically, say since about the 1940s, Israel or forces within it, have struck targets outside the Palestine/Israel landmass, for example, targets in Lebanon.

The 'organization' known today as Hamas, on a very basic level and linear historically timeline, was not there/here yet (back in the 1940s). The daily news stories rife in popular newspapers and radio from 1946 to 1956 were not necessarily 'Israel seeks Hamas targets'. 
It may have been more, particular groups declaring to be acting on behalf of advancing certain plans targeted certain targets.

All said, the idea of following through on a vow of destroying any and all threats post the October 7 incident of a few years ago, may be something Israel or forces within it are doing, attempting to, highly considering based on calculations, etc., however again, what's going on in a particular entities brain or mind, is what's in their brain and mind. Just because that entity might assert something is justified based on their assessments and calculations, does not necessarily mean it's justified by everyone else in the world, which brings up another major issue and concern.

The line in the sand of how much is too much, and when going to far, such as in the efforts, statements for, or intentions of defense, protection, security, and revenge.

Israel, Palestine, Jerusalem, Gaza tensions, are not the only places in the world and its history where this subject matter has come up. Entire populations and towns have been wiped out the result of the backlash of an attack whether actual or perceived.

Word is spreading that a shooter emerged taking the lives of at least 2 children and injuring at least 17 others; perhaps 20 or more persons physically affected by gunfire as of about 11am EST, August 27, 2025.
The location was Annunciation Church in South Minneapolis, MN. Developing story. Law enforcement and family reunification seems still active there.

There are at least several areas where talk in news sources is going on, and some of these pertain to talks.
Of the immediately accessible and salient of the areas:

The nuclear reactor race in outer space. Some Russian press feels the power generated by proposed US reactors is relatively small. Timeline 2030, at least for US reactor on the moon. Russian timeline for their version of reactors on the moon said to be about 2035. The subject of development on Mars is not left out; hence, in general, in competition in outer space.

Another area, is the old who has more power and power to destroy the other conversation, ongoing since at least the Cold War. One Russian newspaper said today the following, translated from Russian to English:

Why throw that stone? Truncated from the saying ...in glass houses; considering the amount of activity gone on with Ukraine in the past few years, especially what media has shown and allowed to be seen.
Russia may be too large to be in 'glass houses'; however, there discomforts with some of the activities, or at least some of the information whether true, false, or distorted, seen and heard about.
It's questionable whether the excerpt from URA.RU should have been repeated.
Time and space limitations exist. The section may be revised at some point.

World powers are already well known. The topic at the priority is sobriety of the use of power. That is amongst what makes for consideration of exaltation.

Meeting or meetings are said to be slated to take place between US leadership and Russian leadership August 6th, tomorrow US local time, perhaps already about now, Russian time.

Russia is a very expansive place, and has a number of time zones.

°°°
-autocorrect and overwriting of the words in this post is not welcome. Slated is the chosen word, not a medical term. Slate gets cleaned by angels. The final word and order is the Lord.
Expansive (not expensive) is chosen; expensive can come off disrespectful. I will not disrespect a place that is expansive. The primary priority today is the value of human life not the value of money.

Who will hold the complete understanding of entirety of the quagmire that has to do with the Russia Ukraine tensions?
Definitely do not want those with evil, misguided, or insufficiently guided, plans, to be them.
So if course for those to whom it applies, the obvious wisdom in being careful.
When 'outsiders', let us say an ordinary US citizen, attempts at assessing the tensions of the Russia Ukraine, typically one of the first principles that come up is what is the line between what is their business and not your business.
Let that be addressed. As long as the US is making major funding, the situation, the trajectory, ramifications, are to a degree our business. The reasons why are simple and evident. There are people in the US that are not sufficiently eating, not sufficiently getting educated, could-be scholarships and pools of funding such as for veterans' assistance programs, are not there.
Simple pay out versus retention of funds, and fund allocation.
There is some very intense drama going on right now (at least in the US ) in regard to funds and financial aspects of housing, such as mortgage rates. When rates are too high which makes paying for a house unaffordable, somewhere down the line, some people are being insufficiently housed or even homeless. Funds to get people off the street in the sweltering heat or freezing cold is always ideal.

Just what is on the rollout of Russia and Ukraine especially in the military tension aspect?
Here are a few of them which could present themselves as points of discussion, in the framework of earlier or present planning versus what really is happening, really could happen, and of course the undetermined yet:

• Reports are going around that developments of bans on Ukrainians being able to enter Russia might involve those bans lasting 20 to 50 years.

That could be a long time in some ways and short in others. 20 years could be a time frame that it takes for a soldier not yet born to be old enough to serve. 50 years are up around those numbers that pertain to places like North Vietnam, South Vietnam, North Korea, South Korea, East Germany, West Germany. After a while people that have family in both sides of the geographic line want the wall to come down.

50 years from now, will such a wall between Russia and Ukraine be befitting in ways it may be perceived today in 2025? Age of technology and future technology.

• Needless to say, economics is a big theme in it all.

What are the things that will be affecting economics 20 years from now, 50 years from now? Will ambassadors still be flying into the region all fired up about the future of oil prices, holding meetings and talks? There might not be a vehicle on the road or in the air that needs a drop of oil or gas 50 years from now.
50 years covers the span from the Holocaust era to an era where a holocaust of the same type and region is unthinkable.

• Illegal immigration. As everyone has learned, illegal immigration is everyone's problem, regardless of where illegal immigrants are entering.

Illustrating through examples, just to make this a bit more elementary, there are a few easy to grab the concept scenarios.
An illegal immigrant enters the US, that illegal immigrant either stays in, or leaves. If the person stays, either caught or not caught, enforced or not enforced; depending, that person might need to be imprisoned, which has a cost and necessitates a process to ensure its maintenance. If the person is found, the person may have to be sent out of the country, which could leave a messy can of worms spilled out, of where does law enforcement send the person.

There are reports that Russia has or has recently had to contend with individuals that are facilitating ways that illegal immigrants can stay there; in other words, perhaps groups of people fabricating and tampering with documents, lining up jobs for the illegals that they very likely would not have gotten.

There is some transferability of the lesson learned, which is that 'illegal immigrant helper cells', could potentially crop up anywhere in the world.

Illegal immigrants can make tensions and conflicts more complex.

• There have been other severe oppression situations in different parts of the globe that have developed.

• Some reports cite statistics that the amount of casualties of the Russia Ukraine tensions surpasses a million, more than some aspects of casualties of WWII.

- What makes a world war? If it's casualties, the requirement may have unfortunately been met;  the expanse of geographic military engagement as in physical fighting, constrained to the area of Ukraine, maybe a saving grace.

True, 'our people need to eat', a concept upheld by a leader or leaders of every nation. Long term and short term in consideration; eat now at the expense of others including them not eating, might have a repercussion of less eating later. 

Who knows what other advents could happen that affect military activities, such as natural disasters, such as earthquakes, factory disasters; what if the border area between Ukraine and Russia is suddenly flooded like what areas of Texas underwent in recent weeks, where both sides need rescue efforts from multiple other nations?, what then becomes of the tensions?, no one can fight, then what, resume after back on your feet?

Numerous nations have held, been present at, or even hosted talks having to do with Russia and Ukraine, and propositions by the two.

Some of what is going on or predicted to go on in the military scheme of things, plausibly globally, 'is not working out', and 'might not work out'.

Ordinarily 1 + 9 is always going to be equal to 10.
First of the year, once that is affirmed, the 10th is going to be 9 days later.

(Perhaps unless there was a way to retroactively correct and hence adjust. The other boys with reports of the moon sighting didn't make their way yet through the mountains to the announcement center because they were blocked by the elk beast.)

Some reputable sources have said the first day, whereas a new month basically starts the evening before that day, for Muharram 1447, coinciding with June 2025, is Thursday; restated for clarity, last night the start of Muharram 1, and 1st full day, is Thursday, today.
Some sources are saying Friday, tomorrow, is the first full day.

Some entities made an announcement online.

The way the announcements are made sometimes makes it sound like some parties not only assert that a certain start date is correct, but that they are the undisputed leader and their announcement should be followed, as though the announcement for the first day of Muharram, or other date, is fact, a problem when there's discrepancy, or they are incorrect. This also happens an unfortunate frequency on dates of popular significant concern, like the start and stop of Ramadhan, and day of Eid.

Part of the whole idea, is the start and stop dates are independent of a political basis being used as the determination of the start and stop dates.

There are websites now with moon phases that are readily available. Fractions of waning might be available as well.

There are guidelines from many years ago on what constitutes moon phase sightings.