News is news, regardless of how it arrives. 
Maybe there is not always a total comfort with the chain of events that led up to recent events, but denying events can be denying facts, and at some point, facts cannot be overlooked.

There may be a chain of events that goes sort of like, the October 7, 2023 events at the social music festival (in the region of Naqab/Negev/Negeb), then it was the backlash series of events, and Ghazans were left constricted; then backlashes to the backlashes, protests everywhere about oppression or oppressive situations on Ghaza; then there were exchange of weapons firing, Iran, Israel, etc.; whether connected or not connected, massive protests calling for change in Iran in regard leadership posts occurred, en segue, massive crackdowns (on protests) occurred, notably starting around the second week of January 2026.

In the past few days, it is almost unavoidable to be made aware of roughly the activities going on in the Middle East, regarding Iran and other missiles landing in other parts of the Middle East.
(A personal take is some of where some of the missiles landed outside of Iran, when different totalities are assessed, spell out there is/was some drug dealing going on that should have stopped and it did not.)

Despite being in a perceived layer, that one can be a story writer about events after the shot caller's shots are carried out, there still is what the facts are.

Of course just remember, everything that has been allowed to happen, is allowed from the Creator, not just hands of men.

There are two salient events that occurred in as many days over this past weekend, as it pertains to close to home.
1- Three US service members died. There are also reports of others injured.
2- Mass shooting in Texas; leaving several fatalities and over a dozen reported injured.

For both these events, it's important to know that there are many different categories of assailants that commit violent activities. Their mental conditions might not necessarily fall into one or the other camp of sane and insane.

Unfortunately there are going to be people that 'romp around' the US and try to paint a picture of all Americans are in one camp, and Islam is in another. They might shout Allahu Akbar, and statements like that, or have T-shirts and symbols on their person with similar at the time of their attack. Now these days, some of the people that dine in, work in, or even own some social spots, may be Muslim. So what's the attack about? Stereotypes as a basis for extremism does not really fit the situation. 
That's a large part of why extremism is called extremism. When people go to the very furthest stretch of the imagination and try to tie different symbols together, and use violence to make a statement, when the statement makes no sense, it accomplished nothing more than more confusion.

A way that this is made clear, and the point substantiated, are recent 'Shia vs non-Shia' tensions in other parts of the world.
Basically the 'regime' (in Iran) targeted in the past weekend's missile strikes is 'Shia'.
Attacking a place to eat and socialize post year 2000, especially given a huge population of Muslims in the US, does not fall in line with what makes any sense. Reckless acts of terrorism reflect oversimplified mindless holding of a stereotype that all Americans and their social spots are pitted against all of Islam; and maybe even with no regard to recent waves of violence in the 'Shia vs non-Shia' considerations. 

In the case of the weekend's shooting in Austin, there probably was some level of preplanning and surveying on the part of the suspect. (Planning and surveying, even if it was just the awareness of what exists and where process, took a length of time, that probably started well before the weekend's array of missile strikes.)


On the one story to address many things, - that a large number students or girls in a school not too far from the areas of targets in Iran, have perished.

Headlines are emerging with figures like 112 victims.

The total scene, going back years ago on through the present, should have been nonexistent.

There were times in decades past where little steps that people were doing after the Ayatollah Khomeini, (words chosen for reference, sometime after 1979), were assessed and evaluated; who were some of the individuals, characters, people, and so on, that were emerging or would follow Khomeini?

Long story short, there are some that may feel that Khomeini was sort of a pinnacle in certain aspects, and other developments after him, were not as high up on the mountain rungs towards that pinnacle or pinnacles. That eventually there would be some discomfort with the regime if people want to call it that, comprised of 'Ayatollahs' and members of that referent arena, after Khomeini got old. So to put a school in area where it might be in the line of fire, -is it to be questioned? Any amount of study of the area could make one know, or could make it likely one knows it was there. Which brings the entire world now to accountability and questioning before judgement day, should the circumstances as a whole should have been allowed to emerge and exist?

There are other series in deeper and more broadly laid out timelines, such as the entire idea of 2 state Palestine Israel and the foreseeable conflicts that would arise. There is even further back than that, such as it was foretold long ago, over a thousand years ago narrated as to statements made thousands of years ago, there would be strife in the region.

...Then to October 7th festival tumult.

There's dimensions of the length of time Persia has been around. Today's politics and different kinds of weapons of mass destruction are a very tiny segment in the timeline.


This cliche, 'ripple effects'. Not surprised it comes up right through here. Anyhow, what will be the cost of oil in the upcoming days? Who will be enriched in the process? What will be recourses for less expensive oil, who walks off with a bunch of money after many people perish?

Darkness. In darkness strange things can happen. This is apparent in activities involving fighting entities, or entities fighting , in the current Russia Ukraine situation.
Internet connectivity in Iran right now is about at an all-time low since the invention of the Internet as we know it. Since so much information is Internet driven these days, pertinently the news, everything that has happened over the course of the last week, as we speak, and for about the next week out, viewers of the Internet as a source for news, might not know everything that has, been, or will go or going on, until years in the future.

There are couple things that could be broadly applied, that are safe to say. The first of course are the verses transliterated min alzhulimat ila nur, or briefly translated, from darkness to light. That's the idea of what many missions in life are about, going from darkness to light.

Unfortunately, evil doers today manipulate the concepts, and turn off the lights to perpetrate evil. 

For at least decades, there has been concern that at some point in the reasonably foreseeable future, there was going to a lights out situation in Ukraine; whatever the buildup and combinations of excuses aside.

Bosnia conflict, markedly the Siege of Sarajevo, may be another lights out situation to make clearer what is being referred to here; 1990s oppression situations.

There are circles that are emerging, drawing a circle around the entirety of situations. Which leads to the second safe comment. Adam was taught the names and nature of everything.

So, no matter how sophisticated and complex the planning of people are, whatever it is they are doing, can have a circle or Circumscribed etch around it, and name it.

This includes conflation strategies.

Right now, there are stories abounding online about multiple news topics stories. They seem and may be presented as separated. Among them are:

• Conditions in Iran especially respective to missile strikes
• Epstein (case) and snowball effect,  of the investigations
• AI getting involved with the Pentagon, party in, party out
• The situation in Ukraine continues almost unabated
• Missile strikes falling elsewhere concurrent all of the above 
• Thousands upon thousands of trafficked persons, and tons of narcotics globally

But, are these really separate issues?

In closing, the two cited safe to say concepts already mentioned, the importance of going to and staying in the light, and plans that have a name for it despite efforts to make it difficult to identify, a subject matter of current is the difference between Khomeini and Khamenei.

There are the basics, such as spelling and year of birth.

Circling back to the safety and security of the US. Silhouettes are emerging in AI related graphics describing affects or potentialities. The hope is, potentialities is where the dangers stop and are left at, and don't materialize to realities.

Conflation.

What's the plan?

What happens when things don't go as planned? Computer models with billions of potential grids, at some point, other things happen. People might choose to go something to hurt themselves in the process, and everything that was done to change everything, changes. That may be where danger lies.

The insistence that weapons of mass destruction are set out at the forefront as primary priority above all else. 
Missiles have been reportedly fired on Iran over the past half day thereabout. Missiles have hit Dubai, it's not 100% certain where they came from at this very second.
There are reports of missiles landing on numerous targets.
The names and places in the exchange of firings are all too familiar, maybe even escalated replay, of what has been intermittently going on in about the last two years.
US, Israel, Iran, Dubai.

Big news outlets say it's mainly about the condition of nuclear arms Iran has, plus an expressed level a disinterest in the current regime of Iran, as the raison detre (d'être) for the missile strikes.

Honestly, hearts change when missiles get fired and they land. It's extremely rare that the only people that get hurt are 'intended' targets, like key weapons administrators or corrupt government officials.

A regime change is typically the behest when missiles land. 'Twas the case in other recent eras, such as Sdam Hsyn (Saddam Husein) of Iraq, or in the Vietnam War.

The title of the HCN previous post, exact wording does not matter much, was 'Paving the Way ... for Lower Standards or Decrease in Morality... and Increase in Debauchery'; when the thoughts were forming of what to say to report today's news, the title was looked at, and for a second there, the thought was nothing more needs to be said, the situation has already been addressed, (or just duplicate the story title), there's some more paving the way for debauchery and lack of morals going on. Who's doing it? Well let's let there conscience speak. Open-ended question, don't come attack me, as no fingers are being pointed. Somebody is doing something to pave the way for worse conditions somewhere down the line. The exact who, might not be readily ascertainable to everyone in the public, and the perpetrators might be a combination of people.

A regime change might occur after heavy missile firing, but is it really going to result in a real regime change in terms of who is directing different aspects of different attitudes?

Moreover, is the resentment of missile strikes, coming from all sides, neighbors and so on, going to be so intensified, that it just winds up with bunches of sour attitudes? 

People around the world are sick of the missile era we are in today. Missiles being fired doesn't have the same meaning as it did say 50 years ago, where it was a sign of the most severe form of message and strategy to bring about change. Sort of like cars, emails and computers. If 2 or 3 guys managed to get a hold of car and drive a few blocks to taunt someone over a social issue, no one cares as folks might have back in the day of Model-T Ford.

Many folks have been through this before. It's Ramadhan, fasting month, Markedly observed popularly by folks in the Middle East and from the Middle East, and missiles are being exchanged in the Middle East, among folks in the Middle East. So here we are, right about at the first 10 day mark, a month usually about 30 days, so the first third or 33.3%, mood says, whatever, and instead of heights of togetherness and seeking 'spiritual goals', Saturday morning media is rife with buildings gutted by fire. Absolutely disgusting.



--
Readers may want to consider minimum (close to boycott) click response on ads run online on stories covering the crisis. Forbidden to capitalize and make money off the woes of others.

--
Commentaries on the relatively recent Big Beautiful Bill, have glared at aspects pertaining to fight might. Depending on how the episode of missile exchanges go for roughly the next 24 hours, folks might be asking, are these events the the issue in unfolding on the practical payout level, what the punctuated spot was or is?

--
Pipe dream of Satan, disruption of calm and fiery scenes during Ramadhan right when the spring comes around after winter.

    [___]
The first line above is purposely left blank. Let readers see what fills in that space. What would answer the question, what could pave the way for lower standards of morality and Increased debauchery? There are a number of thoughts that can come to mind, the general spirit of what the answer is, etc.

Importantly, while crystallizing what those things are, is identifying solutions to a rapidly surging and growing problem. Especially in the US.

Due to that today's present condition is rife with misunderstanding and misinformation, in sum, some people just don't know, the balance and what goes into finding the right balance, below is an effort to lay out some of the components of the situation at hand, now in 2026.

Component 1- Right from wrong. Preferred behavior, thoughts, intentions, actions, 'in the eyes of 'the Lord's, the 'Creator' and titles of that ilk; preferred over what is forbidden, disdained, disliked, and unpreffered. That said, maybe the actual component #1 is, what is right, wrong, lawful and unlawful, in the Lord's book and US law, and ones that are both.

For the sake of time, generally, most people have a rough cut idea, even if they aren't religious, what is right and what is wrong, or where to find it, especially the big and simple things, like, do not steal, do not lie.

There is stop right there junction,- Lord's law, and US law. For a long time, the idea of law of the land or government was so that it was in sync with Lord's law.

It seems that, that's changing, at faster rate for the worst. It is as though everyday, people are manipulating or attempting to manipulate longstanding US law, to try to form up new laws that are far removed from the old ones, moreover, that puts the Country on the course of, increased debauchery. 

What those manipulators are doing, are paving the way for lower US law standards.

There are a bunch of words that can refer to what's being talked about here. In regards to debauchery, referred to are all the words covering turpitude, indecency, immoral, perversion, lechery, salacity, and promiscuity. Defining each if those words could be component two. There are more words, but will be refrained from due to multiple meanings, time and webspace.

Does Bartholomew really have to be cited? Do individuals that went through trials farther or more severe than known humans at this time can contend with, before they would be worthy of service at high stations, need to be gone into. Most of those folks were already of very high degree (of elevation, piety, etc.).

Let's make it real simple. Respectfully. If the devil approached an adult you get than the middle age, but older than a teenager, say about 27 years old, and said, please go rob the little old blind lady down the street, would you, he, she do it? Probably not.

Next challenge level, what if the individual was told, go rob the old lady, and I'll give you $1000, you'll be made famous and popular. Would you do it, or is the individual if anywhere near same, do it?

This is not an extreme circumstance if Robin Hood stealing from the rich for the poor, or an emergency to save another old lady in the hospital, this is an if everything else reasonably in good standing, in an isolated situation scenario.

A third level of complexity, what if the individual is told, rob the old lady, film yourself doing it, send the film elsewhere, just have trust, no one such as your parents and teachers at school will ever know about it, and you will be granted admission to an elite club of people with access to all the regular vices like drugs and the s word you wish, and, you will get $2000 to do it instead of just $1000.

At that extreme of silliness, it's readily understood that for a healthy person to turn to robbing an old lady, and glorifying it with a video, is wrong.

The essential core concept is the same, that involves some of the cases going around the US over about the past year or two, on through as we speak. 

It has to stop. Now.

Since when do 14 year olds, take pornographic films of themselves? Not even under pressure of gunpoint, coercion, or abuse, but simply because they think it's 'cool', 'cute', 'in style', or someone offered them some money.

News has become public that there are technically minors, as in under 16 or 18 years old, depending on the region, that are doing unthinkable things, that adults twice that age would never consider, even ones 'not religious'.

Teenagers around the age of 14 that is known, nevermind what isn't known to the public and news media, are posting videos, footage, pictures, disgraceful things, of themselves, online, or shared some kind of way, maybe through social media, or a secret recording for sale to people that have access to it.

Those teenagers are old enough to know that what they are doing they should not be doing.

Here comes what some people think takes the place of basic morality. An individual tells a teenager, send videos, and they won't tell anybody. The teenager sends the video, and the person breaks the promise and either tells or threatens to tell others. At that, the person tells the teenager, they will let everybody know about, like parents and teachers, unless the teenager pays a sum of money.

So now the teenager is being extorted.

Who gets in trouble these days, in the US (today)? Typically no one but the extortionist. 
The parents (enough of them to make a point,) don't even care about their teenagers' behavior; it's more important that the extortionist be caught. 
Indecent activity, it goes unaddressed. Trafficking and producing indent material, gone unaddressed.

What this discussion is about, is the focus on making this legal issue, the law of the land, on the extortion for exposure of doings without addressing the lost compass of morality, to the extent that it's starting to develop a generation of youths that think doing activities like filming pien if themselves and selling it, us an okay thing to do.

If the standard at least in the Country's eyes does not firm up, what might be the next less lower standard of morality in the generation after them?

This sounds like where this is all going, are debates over public nudity among adults and children, as letting loose to the point that in the future, the 'expectation', is for adults and children to be walking around holding hands in the distance areas of government, eating, and malls, in the nude. People with just a pair of shorts on are doing too much, and seen as strange, ad become condemned.

There are other situations that arose. You tell me before it's said, it's not worth bringing up or writing about it. If it is brought up, then it's an embarrassment to the Country and its institutions, which can put the blog writer on the less desirable.

Since when do grown, over 18 years old, adults, in government uniforms, be let to roam scot-free when they engaged in acts of debauchery, because someone told them if they did not do it they might lose their job? It doesn't add up.

And if it keeps going, there'll be nothing substantive to make a judgement out of.

Key takeaway: regardless if there's cat-fishing, 'sextortion, extortion involved, everybody involved needs to be at n in par level, and that does not mean make new laws that let the situation go unabated.

Just about every newspaper, at least online, have story up around the top 5 highest ranking headlines, whether a piece of writing or video, amplifying faults of ICE especially in the process of illegal immigrant problem mitigation.

But here is the thing, problems that are correlates to illegal immigrants and immigration, such as recurrent driving while intoxicated incidents that claim life after life, don't necessarily have to be cracked down on by ICE; a range of law enforcement arms and agencies are well within their rights to perform certain functions to accomplish pretty much the ultimate same.

Basically, relief from massive amounts of fraud, plots to destroy aspects of the US, assaults, dangerous drunk driving, human trafficking, and a host of other problems that were indeed caused by illegal immigrants, or potentially could occur if not preempted, is not the story of ICE, and bashing against ICE, ICE having to bash back for their own protection, and the back and forth aggression that seems to keep gaining momentum.

Reducing the problems caused by illegal immigration is, as already stated, reducing the problems of illegal immigration. 

At any given minute, the entire method of reducing the problem could change. 

People have someone to riot against, targets to attack, teenagers threatening to do unspeakable acts towards ICE agents, politicians have a platform to try to get more votes, and media outlets have a way of making more money by exploiting everything in the entirety;- that's not what protecting this country, and mitigating problems is about.

It is understood that in the process of trying to perfect America, there may have been some imperfections, and possibly some more incidents that fall on a side of a line in the sand that might not show well once media adds certain kinds of hype to it. 

The larger higher objective might be a broader more encompassing agenda involved in the checks and balances so that for example, whomever conducts procedures for illegal immigration mitigation does do according to proper boundaries.